Smokenomics

BigOlDOg

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
51
Reaction score
14
Points
8
Location
Columbia, SC
Grill
Ironwood 885
Let‘s discuss cooking science, well really what I’ve done in the past on a stick vs traeger.

So you read or from what I’ve gathered with super smoke mode is to lower my cooking temps and increase my cooking times on a traeger. If I want more smoke throughout the cook the lower temp on super smoke mode the more smoke... Let me clarify before I get too much grief as I’m not saying 165 produces more smoke than 225. I’ve been successful in my other cooks at higher temps (250-265) on a traeger but didn’t get the smoke flavor I’m use to. Therefore I was instructed to cook at a lower temp on super smoke mode.. Well I’ve tried this twice now and what‘s normally a successful cook turned out unbelievably tough. Now my logic kicks in and makes me think, if I’m cooking to an internal of 200-205 but I’m only cooking at 200, I’m never gonna get there. Not to mention fat rendering basically doesn’t happen and your cook times go way beyond a respectable expectation. Meaning at 250-265 I’m usually an hour a pound. This last was just under eight pounds and after 11 hours just got into the stall, CRAZY!!!

I’m aware after X hours meat typically doesn’t absorb any more smoke and some like to wrap their meat to get through the stall.. Personally I dont wrap as I like the slightly drier edges you get from not doing so but I have wrapped in the past when cooking multiple pieces of meat. Is that truly the only way I’m going to get through a stall and have fat render at those lower temps on a traeger?

Why can’t they produce a super smoke mode at a higher temp? I can get great smoke taste at higher temps on a stick...

What are yall doing to take advantage of super smoke mode but also have a successful cook thats normally at a higher temp?

Low and slow but is there really a too low and too slow?

Just trying to open a good conversation as pellets are new to me and while I like the simplicity of it I still want my cooks to be equally successful as my stick cooks are, well mainly as tasty!

Lets talk
 

bfletcher

Active member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
222
Reaction score
93
Points
28
Location
SW Ohio
Grill
I 885
I'm not a scientist, so I'm only speaking from my feeble mind. If you haven't already, you might consider experimenting with various brands of pellets, as I occasionally read from folks whom feel they have better experiences among specific brands. I'm fond of Lumber Jack and use their Char-Hickory blend quite often when that blend is appropriate to the meat I'm preparing. I latched-on to that brand early-on after a bag or two from Traeger, so I have limited experience with other brands.

On the limited occasions where I read of folks comparing their offset experience to a pellet smoker I hear them share there's a different smoke experience between the two. When I ponder that, it seems appropriate to me that a burning handful of wood processed into pellets might yield different results than logs. My only experience before using a pellet smoker was charcoal and, initially, I was discouraged. As weeks and months progressed, I found myself growing fond of the pellet smoke experience.

I only tried Super Smoke (and/or very low temps) a few times so other, more experienced folks may have different feedback but for my personal preference I abandoned that method and I smoke at 225 or north thereof. I'm a bark fan and it felt to me that I had better results if I smoked at a minimum temp of 225.

Good luck!
 
OP
OP
B

BigOlDOg

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
51
Reaction score
14
Points
8
Location
Columbia, SC
Grill
Ironwood 885
Im no scientist either but thank you for the reply. I have wanted to get different brands of pellets and will do that, it could be something as simple as that in regards to taste!! I enjoy the time of building a fire and cooking that method but also the simplistic way of a pellet is nice so I hope others will provide their input as well. Thank you
 

jp9724

Active member
Smoke of the Month
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Messages
251
Reaction score
80
Points
28
Location
Edmonton
Grill
Ironwood 885
Well I've found for a long cook on a bigger cut of meat i'll start at 165f with super smoke but after a couple hours ill turn it back up to 225F and it gives a bit more smoke flavor, did that with my beef ribs this weekend and worked pretty well. Higher than 200f though, I found the super smoke button to be just a button to press in my opinion. But if you're used to a stick burner you'll probably never get the intense smoke flavor you're used to sadly. A smoke tube also helps in the first few hours of the cook!
 

Latest Discussions

Top